Unistonium, Standard Theory and Einstein's Brain

Unistonium, Standard Theory and Einstein's Brain   
L. Edgar Otto      06 October, 2013    (an offering for open link Monday for imaginary gardens)

Yeats in the poem "Stamper in the Sky", made the universal point that the sentient creature paints an image of God as if a projection of its own mind.  We great apes as in the sci fi movie full of jazz and classical Wagner stand before the monolith to ignite new stars at a critical point of their replication in which each if we can partly see into them are full of stars.  We now motherless star babies will have to think of something soon.

It is clear that ideas of deja vu, the synchronicity of dreams as in Jung's thermodynamic model of the mind allows that over a small interval of time anticipating or foreseeing so far into the future we actually feel, across the hemispheres or in deeper structures of our mind... we have seen or been in some place of observation before.

But it is also true of dreams and their interpretations as in Freud that we have a vast sense of hidden regions, the dark subconscious of our thinking that inspires curiosity and vast reactions to superstitions, recapitulation of seats of process usually starting in sets of three from our fish souls up, that has us tell stories, hear and heed voices, become attached to and embellish them looking for a sense of unity in the truth and in our wholeness of well being.  In the act of living in a society we go thru the motions of processes sometimes defining our life by our roles.

Many of the great thinkers in physics start out to behold and praise the handiwork of a Creator who has care or moods. Yet often in the attempt they find or their disciples find, going way beyond the intent of teacher, that in analysis of ideas that do not always seek first the simple causes as physical, puts these ideas of higher ultimate being as ever more distant or vanishing from the cosmic landscape.  So Descartes with good intentions is said to be the meditation that undermined the world view of the Church that is a gateway of separation from the older unity of religion and science.

Cosmology is the tragic loss of such a concept painted on the sky of higher love to which the lens grinder Spinoza, for his faith was excommunicated as the general idea of atheism grew as a term of those who work against beliefs.  Anything supposedly higher that that point of awareness, understanding, and consciousness in the spacious now is derided as metaphysics even if the once schools of the subject gone fallow in the seeding of thoughts held we reach a speed of a maximum in the "psi plasm" by which after a great struggle we can sustain wisdom, predict scenarios of warning of higher dangers than that of the lower creatures in the wild, even imagine higher realms of dreams and returns to homelands and gardens, to the milk and honey breasts again of a caring mother thru the generations objects of desire.  We coin the idiom our head is in a spin so to speak, for where else does the light go beyond our cubits of building brick by brick from the quoin of birth, we drawn or in free fall?

So much depends on the exceptions to conservation of CPT violations, the breaking of symmetries, the focus of such abstract higher light and complimentary darkness into some level of contrast that the Standard Theory explains the observed sets and decay of particles as we go back in theory to arrive at origins as if in our microscopes we view in the depth of the small nearby or the distance in the large far away as if in time the threeness of unity in the staircase of forces.  In a wide sense this is the issue of chirality by which we as bilateral creatures, between the snakes or reeds and the starfish and lily pads self adapt the physicality of our brains.  Our brains, also hard wired on pattern levels like the chemistry, induction flows, nerves and DNA are also defined and limited by the totality as if quanta and loops of gravity.

Einstein's brain, from this crude level of analysis and of what we are to make of it in the search for physics genius or creativity, gives some hope to tell us something of all brains in structure and processes.  We know as in the sense of the urban myth we only use part of our brains, or DNA codes, or visible matter in the universe and so on,.  We want the magic bullet of respected and simple cures after a long climb of research in fits and starts to climb to the wider dream, think about it and bring back to our familiar home the wisdom again in ways with objective certainty new seekers can understand.

Some have found a higher connectivity between the hemispheres of Einstein's brain, certainly close to the foundations of things that the plasticity may adapt and compensate in non-average ways.  A proof by those cases of exclusion in average people with physical injury in specific areas or in the newer methods of today that imagines it can tell us something of our core souls and monitor our dreams our technology of scanning, our refinement of magnetic and other fields... as if we can be sure of behavior say we took a scan of Dalmer's brain to explain how some individuals against all the thrust for survival as if there is a death wish that disturbs our continuum of social values.  While we are lazy to go over data in the detail, we are not wrong to seek the universal simplicity of explanations of the world so trusting those who we imagine experts, geniuses who worked long to master their fields.

Some report that certain areas are advanced in his brain like regions where the ability to play string instruments on one side or the piano on the other side while music itself is a universal language of transiting if not unifying the whole.  Recent analysis suggest in addition to the old observation that one side of his brain had more connections between the nerves in the secondary levels... a condition we now know where nerves do attatch and connect to each other with more than simple connections, that the area is wider in the convolutions wherein a potential is there if not the indication that this speaks of higher intelligence where found.

Yet this seems to come at a price in the face of it... the larger brains of dolphins are not connected such that they must dream on one side, two healthy brains if unconnected that in the exposure of the open degrees of freedom in the sea half of their brain can stay awake.  For it seems that those areas close or at what is the creative and most abstract regions of human thought in Einstein are more separated.

So considering the grounding reference frame of unity despite the sparks of randomness of which one could imagine the formulas and process of electron work force as a grounding process as well, and the time aspects from that as a measure of our ignorance of the unknown, what happens in the dark depths of quantum theory and computation, the doubly symmetric awareness or the mistake we all make in geometry where we have to make our values half again in the influence of higher dimensions of force fields, there to bring it back home again to what we feel a physical grounding, it seems to me only natural that a human with such a brain structure would feel and imagine that things are not what they seem when it comes to time as simultaneity.

So some pioneer, by endowment can show the world and communicate what for him was the intimate vision as vision to which the average mind may stand in disbelief or awe.  This is not to say science is always done this way for much of it is the luck of secondary or accidental discovery, and much of it is the clues we work out in our dreams.  Yet, we should not as objective scientist dismiss in the higher longing of higher regions of a brain that wants both sides to connect into a still wider generalized theory to which Einstein as some said in his mistaken goals in the face of quantum theory that unifies everything in a universal set of simple laws that can with assurance reach into expanded realms so therein is the abstraction we know as genius, but of us all as specimens of humanity beyond local color and so on or claims for or against the exceptional evidence of the extraordinary.   Physics, as well as people, can be an enterprise that for our survival makes us too smart for our own good.

I stand midway between the very large and the very small at once still yet moving.  This much we know that what we see is influenced by the frame from which we view things as observers, and anything so observed including the miraculous organization that is our brains concretely and minds abstractly is changed by the act of our observation in the very small...  and a watched pot of helium mysteriously will not boil.

In this higher sense of unity, of a spirit that rides over the relentless and oft spooky eddies of a directed branching history we can see the world as a static and steady state as Einstein was surprised at the instability that leads to the Hubble expansion... that for me is an error in the restrained power of our existing mathematics and statistics, notations as well as ideas for a better language design of logic. Did he not consider in the hieroglyphics left near his death bed a sort of quantized sequence to consider the universe as cyclic? Did he not ride the light until the bitter end?

* * * * *